Friday, November 29, 2019

Youtube Channels Suspended, New Christmas Song

Remember how in my previous post I posited that one of my youtube channels with millions of views and thousands of subscribers might serve as a new outlet for my own music? Not only was that true to some extent and actually a really good idea, now it's an impossibility as BOTH my channels were terminated just days before Thanksgiving. First they got my hugely popular channel and then took down my personal Exit World music and creativity channel as well.

I know who is responsible for it but I am not sure of the extenuating circumstances behind it. See, on this widely popular channel called JustGoodStuff I had many clips of "Mister Rogers' Neighborhood" programs that were well over 40 years old. They had been up for easily over a year or longer. I began uploading some clips after the 2 Twitch marathons that were broadcast in 2017 and 2018. I had recorded many of the shows while they were airing during those marathons. These clips were very popular and well-received. They were not necessarily the reason for the explosion in popularity of this particular channel. That was attributed to some Tim Conway & Harvey Korman clips from the Carol Burnett Show that I had compiled. My original plan had been to put together and upload 4 of these compilations at about 15 minutes each to resemble a game. The clips all featured Conway & Korman breaking character as a result of doing unscripted bits and lines. I think it only took about 2 months before the first video compilation hit a million views. The second video was uploaded shortly after the first and went the same way in terms of views. When my channel was suspended on Monday the first video was at over 2 million and the second at over 1 million. I have never had any videos do that well.

Those 2 videos along with an earlier Conway/Korman video I had uploaded and a segment from a 1973 episode of "The Tonight Show" with Johnny Carson also led to this channel getting an extraordinary number of subscriptions per day. In fact, I was actually annoyed at my phone going off so frequently with emails stating I had new subscribers all the time. 

It is possible that these videos and subscriptions played a part in the large number of views I was getting on the Mister Rogers videos as well. I'm not totally sure. There has been a lot of Mister Rogers stuff going on the last 2 years due to what would have been his 90th birthday, 50th anniversary of his show and 15th anniversary of his death. Not to mention the documentaries and movies that have been coming out about him as well.

So those videos were getting plenty of views and comments as well. Nowhere near what the Conway/Korman & Carson videos were getting but still a good amount of traffic. I was at 8150 subscribers and one of my most recent uploads was my own rendition of "Ding Dong Merrily On High" & "Gloria in Excelsis" which I combined into a medley and called "In Excelsis Medley". Within the 3 weeks it was up it had received over 200 views and had 9 likes with no dislikes. I would have never gotten those kinds of numbers on my own Exit World channel. So my initial conclusion had manifested. 

I also had a crazy thought. Why shouldn't I check to see if this channel could be monetized. No harm done, right? I mean, I wasn't getting my hopes up. I knew that most of the content on there was not mine but I was putting it together in unique ways or adding my own background music to some videos. I was almost certain they'd say no.

About a week or so after making the request sure enough the expected response came in. "No, you cannot monetize this channel." OK, at least I know for sure now. A few weeks later and all my work is gone. All the hours I'd leave the computer on overnight to upload a longer video trampled on and invalidated.

One more thing to consider: in the last 2 weeks youtube started talking about this thing called COPPA which is supposedly something that's 'meant to protect children.' Now every time you uploaded a video you had to check a box that declared that your video was either made for children or not made for children. Honestly speaking, I didn't like how the choices were worded. If you choose 'not made for children' does that mean your videos may be considered inappropriate for them and then you get unwanted special designation on the videos? And if you choose 'made for children' you're catering to them? So needless to say it was rather confusing. I decided the best choice for me was that my videos were not made for children.

Last week a number of my Mister Rogers clips were taken down and I received 2 copyright strikes. I wondered why they chose those particular videos and left all the others. I also wondered why I received one copyright strike for a single video and then another one copyright strike for 6 other videos. That didn't make a lot of sense. But I was still in the game. I had one more strike to go. I figured they didn't take down the other Mister Rogers videos for whatever reason so I left them up as well. And youtube had said that if I went to their 'copyright school' those 2 strikes would expire in 3 months. So I did it. All it is is a short cartoon you have to watch and then answer 3 questions about copyright that are discussed in the animation. I did it and passed and in 3 months I would be back to no strikes. Just to let some of my subscribers know though, I made one video with some of my own background music and some lines of sentences that basically let them know the position I was in and the chance that channel could vanish at any given moment.

And voila! On Monday morning I was informed via email that I received a 3rd copyright strike for the remaining Mr. Rogers videos that were still up and that my entire channel had been taken down. I know for a fact that there is no way to reinstate a channel that has content you don't own on it. So the milestones of subscribers and millions of views for the unique content that I had uploaded were all erased. What I was trying to most figure out was why. WHY NOW? I suspect the request for monetization of the channel could have had something to do with it. Also this COPPA thing. And the current hype for all things Mr. Rogers may have played a part as well.

As much as it pained me to get my channel shut down by the company associated with the man I considered a personal hero and whose program was something I could never get enough of growing up and even later on, the pain was even more debilitating when on Tuesday morning I received an email stating that my Exit World channel was also taken down because it was linked with the other channel. This was my own personal channel for my own music and video creations. Okay, I may have had a few things on there that weren't mine as well, but they were few and they had been there since before I created the JustGoodStuff channel. There were never any issues. I had never received any copyright strikes for those. If you'll remember, that channel was even monetized for a while until they changed their standards to better serve the elite channels. 

Pissed as I was, I finished writing a one and a half page letter which I emailed to the Fred Rogers Company (FRC). I don't expect anything to come of that but I wanted them to know that what they did was a very much anti-Mr. Rogers thing to do and that he would never object to the content of his shows being online because he believe in sharing and in fair use.
There is a possibility for me to get my Exit World channel back up but I have to appeal and send in this form to youtube or google or whoever the hell it is. I don't feel like doing it. I think it'll be a time-waster. They have the final say. Welcome to the free world. 

I had gone to a Mr. Rogers group on Facebook and announced what happened and said I was going to write the letter and asked for any ideas. This very un-Mr. Rogers-like group pretty much acted as my judge and jury with an immense amount of self-righteousness and undoubted hypocrisy. One who had copyrighted images from the recent Laurel & Hardy movie (among other things) on his own Facebook had the gall to say that I deserved what I got for using what didn't belong to me! Another one mentioned the Fred Rogers Company's right to sue me! Sue me? For what? Good luck with that!

I have no doubt these accusers and naysayers spent countless hours watching the videos I uploaded. But now all of a sudden they are armchair copyright attorneys and defenders of the rights of intellectual property owners. After receiving a rash of comments siding with the FRC, I finally called them all a strange bunch--certainly they knew nothing of who Fred Rogers really was; many have just jumped on the Rogers hype bandwagon--and told those who supported what happened to me that they themselves better be obeying copyright laws by not watching anything that's been illegally uploaded. Because, after all, if you're going to be self-righteous, then you'd better be righteous yourself. 

So I am not sure what I'm going to do. This did put a damper on the Thanksgiving Day anticipation. My initial thoughts were to abandon youtube forever and not use it anymore for anything. (I refuse to capitalize youtube any longer). But they're like the ebay of the video world. Where else are you gonna go to build that massive viewership and potential revenue? I still do have my ExitWorldTopic channel (or TopicExitWorld, whatever it's called) but that's fully controlled by CD Baby not me.

Most importantly for me now is to finish and release the new Christmas song I've been working on. I'd love to have my own channel to upload the video to but it's not an option at this time. When it's done and released I'll get it up on Vimeo and Soundcloud and wherever else I can find. Oh, and of course, ChristmasSongsRadio.com. They play my stuff and that might be the best place to get it promoted. By the way, the song is going very well and I should be done recording it in no more than a few days and then mixed and mastered and released with artwork. 

Tuesday, November 5, 2019

A New Avenue for My Music?

I have discovered something interesting. Other than my Exit World YouTube channel I do have another one that has a couple of videos with a million plus views and over 7,300 subscribers at the moment. The high number of views and subscribers happened this past spring when I created some compilation videos of a TV show. I had no idea I was going to get this sort of response. In fact, my first million-view video happened within just 4 weeks of uploading it. It is now at over 2 million and my subscriber count has skyrocketed from what it was before this video.

My discovery is this: anything that I upload to this channel immediately gets views and likes. Some of course get a lot more than others. But I have decided that I can use this to my advantage. I will upload some of my own original creations on this channel. Not the 'from the archives' material but my better quality material.

I have done so today. I uploaded my "In Excelsis Medley" recording from a few years back onto this channel and in about 12 hours time it has 75 views and 6 likes. There is no way it would have anything even remotely close to this on my Exit World channel. So it will be interesting to see where this goes and how many views it will have by Christmas. This may even be a way to get some sales for my music, though at the particular moment this track is not available for purchase anywhere.

I did not just upload the song, however. I took the cover of the Christmas EP I released some years ago and added some animated snowfall to it. A good visual helps promote any audio recording.

That's one bit of potential good news. In another bit, I was working on another instrumental song to use as background music for some videos. But the song was turning out so well that the thought came into my head to write some lyrics for it and turn it into a Christmas song. So I've been working on that and that's the route I'm going now. This will be a holiday tune perhaps for a single release or an EP release if I can get a few more songs recorded within the next 4-6 weeks or so. But I am really excited for this song particularly since I haven't made any new songs this year with the exception of the 2 that served as background music.

Friday, November 1, 2019

From the Archvies: Better Bass & Stereo Recording



The 4th track I have uploaded to YouTube is one inspired by a 1967 song by The American Breed titled "Bend Me Shape Me." It's particularly influenced by the verse part of the song. The instruments used in it are the Casio PT-1, rubber band bass, can drums and some seed pods as shakers. I never titled this recording either but for the sake of the uploads and these blog posts I'm calling this one "Bending Shaping".

You'll notice a few things different about this recording vs. the previous three. First, the bass is a lot more definitive and powerful. Second, the recording is in stereo.

I mentioned needing to find a way to get a better bass sound from my rubber band checkers tin instrument. Well, what I did was take a speaker that I had from somewhere and attached a 1/8" phono plug to it. I had no proper tools at the time so every connection ever made was shoddy and dodgy and led to intermittent and crackly operation. I still have this speaker in a box in the garage and I need to pull it out to take photos. But this is what I used. I would take the speaker and attached it to the back of the tin via the rubber bands and it would stay in place. The phono plug end would go directly into the mic jacks on whatever device I was using to record. I say 'whatever' because by this point I had purchased a small home stereo system complete with AM/FM radio, a single cassette deck and a record player. Perhaps more importantly, this system had two jacks for left and right microphones which leads to my next point.

The ability to record in stereo was very important to me after noticing so many of those hard-panned stereo recordings of the 1960s. I loved that the songs were mixed with bass and drums on one speaker while guitars and keyboards were on the other. Or sometimes bass guitar was on one side and drums were on the other. At other times many of the vocals were isolated on one side so I could choose to listen only to the instruments. I thought that was fantastic. So I wanted to do the same. This particular recording of mine was in stereo with the bass instrument and drums on the right and the keyboard and seed pods on the left.

Sometime around 8th and 9th grade I purchased the aforementioned stereo system. Probably closer to 9th grade. As mentioned, this system had a single cassette deck so I was not able to do overdubs on it. I still had to use my sister's boombox. So what I would do is record a couple tracks using her boombox and then play those back with a mic right at one of the speakers and play something live into the other mic and record all that into my new system. Of course, I would make sure that whatever I was playing live was some physical distance away from what was playing on her boombox in order to avoid microphone bleed. I wanted as much stereo separation as possible. But I was also limited by how long my mic cables were and how loud I could play anything there.

I'm pretty sure that "Bending Shaping" was a 3 track recording. I believe the first track was the drums, second was bass and third was the Casio PT-1 and seed pods simultaneously. The Casio had the ability to record anything you played on its keys. I would put it on the record mode and then play it back via the memory play button. One thing I discovered on my own--this wasn't even in the manual--if I pressed one of the small colored buttons before the memory play button, what I had recorded would play back 4 whole times. I don't remember which button caused this but it was a great discovery to me. It allowed me to have the keyboard play by itself while I played something live at the same time. Thus, in essence I could record overdubbed tracks playing back from the boombox, the Casio playing by itself and anything I wanted to play live all at the same time. However, that would require some nearly precise timing and sync on the part of the overdubbed tracks and the Casio; needless to say I didn't do that very often.

From this point on, many if not most of my archive recordings will feature the new bass sound and a stereo soundscape. I continued to dabble in mono recordings, however due to the fact that my sister's boombox offered portability which meant I could record anywhere. My new system with the stereo mic inputs stayed in its designated place most of the time and I moved it only when I intended to do serious recording. And there was an anomaly with this new stereo system--the cassette player seemed to operate at a slightly higher speed than normal so anything I recorded on it and played back somewhere else sounded slower. That would make for terrible pitch matching depending on the order things were recorded.

So that's the story behind this particular recording and some of the 'advancements' made during that time. Those were highly experimental days.




Sunday, October 27, 2019

From the Archives: Papa Was A Rolling What?? (1989)



This here is the 2nd song from that recording session long ago with my brother. This is the song that I described in the previous post as being inspired by that classic track, "Papa Was A Rolling Stone" by The Temptations. That song was ahead of its time no doubt and there was nothing else like it. I first heard it on my sister's boombox one day while at home for lunch from school. It was unbelievable. I didn't hear the entire song so I had not idea who it was or what it was called. And there was no Google back then to try to look up lyrics with.

The little that I heard of that song struck a chord with me. Some time after when I finally heard it again and was able to record it from the radio I played it incessantly. This happened to be the single, 6-minute version which was all I knew for many years. When I finally discovered the full-length, 12-minute album version I was floored all over again. But that was many years later. When I made this recording with my brother all I knew was the single version.

As I wrote in the previous post I tried doing a drum beat similar to the one in that song. For the edited single version all you ever hear is hi-hat and bass drum. There's a little bit more on the unedited album version. But I copied from the single.

Similarly, my recording features only repetitive 3 notes from my bass instrument as does the line from 'Papa.' The notes are not the same however. Again, I didn't have musical know-how back then so I couldn't match my playing note-for-note with the actual song. But I didn't care because what I did end up playing sounded good to me.

Another thing I did with my bass instrument was to strike one of the rubber bands on it and then repeatedly and quickly bend the tin while the string rang. That kind of gave it a wah-wah sound that the guitar on 'Papa' had. You have to listen for that very carefully though. I did it many times throughout the recording.

My brother added the strumming sounds from the homemade guitar and the keyboard sounds from the Casio PT-1 which only worked intermittently throughout the recording due to the way I had hired power from a dry cell to it.

Like I did on the first recording we made I changed the tempo a little on this one near the end. Why? I'm not sure but probably because it would get really boring playing the same beat at the same tempo for over 3 minutes. That can feel like an eternity. (Once for one of my much more recent recordings I added fingersnaps for 3 minutes and it felt like forever! My hands were even hurting!!)

So that's the story behind these two songs from my first ever recording session (with my brother). After this I pretty much did everything else on my own, though I do have some later recordings which my aunt played on and a friend from college and I worked on together.

After these initial recordings I continued to experiment with sounds and look for ways to get better sonic recordings. I'm a big bass guy and getting a nice bass sound has always been important to me. Even then. Those little voice microphones were not sufficient in this. When I discovered that I could use a speaker as a microphone I found a much better way to record my bass rubber-band instrument. And the great thing was that I could just attach the speaker on the other side of the tin underneath the rubber bands and for the most part it would stay there. This thing served as a pickup of sorts.

Eventually I started using the other side of the tin--the Chinese Checkers side--with rubber bands as well, although these were of the more common, thinner type for electric guitar sounds. I used a tiny Radio Shack amp around that time which I have written about in the past.

It will be fun and interesting to go back and think about all these recordings and how they were done. I might unlock some memories that I never thought I'd revisit.

Just one final thing: I tried using some software to lessen tape hiss and other extracurricular sounds from these old recordings but I didn't like how they sounded after being processed. I tried several different settings and they all seemed to take something away from the recordings and in some cases made the sound harsher. So hope you don't mind as all the hiss has been left in. This truly gives the most authentic representation of what the recordings really sound like.


Saturday, October 19, 2019

From the Archives: My First Recording Session with Special Guest, Part 1 (1989)


So my last post was about my very first song recording. This post will be about a couple of song recordings I did before that one with the assistance of my brother.

When I discovered the ability to record music via the overdub function of my sister's dual cassette boombox, I thought it would be cool to get some help recording. I quickly realized that the more overdubs you did the worse the overall recording sounded, not to mention the cheap cassettes and microphones I was using. So if I could get someone to record with me that would eliminate the need for twice as many tracks and thus preserve at least some quality.

I used to make deals or bets with my brother and they usually involved him having to record with me if he lost or as a result of some other exchange. In fact, to this day he still owes me several hours of recording even 30 years after the fact. But I came to enjoy recording on my own even if there was a sacrifice in sound quality.

My brother and I had no musical training. We never learned any instruments by this point. And I was thrilled to record stuff while he wasn't really interested. But we did have some sort of deal and at least I got these 2 recordings which I have preserved for all these years.

I can't be certain of the order but I believe both of these songs were recorded as follows:

1st track: drums-me; Casio PT-1-bro
2nd track; bass-me; guitar-bro

Around that time I used to have this huge dry cell batter that I had bought for some home experiments. When I didn't have money to buy AA batteries for the Casio I found a way to wire this dry cell to the AC adapter jack on the keyboard. But it wasn't a solid connection and so you'll hear the keyboard playing intermittently on both recordings.

That little guitar wasn't easy to play either because the way I had set it up to have the strings ring as best they could would not stay in place. My brother had even said that I gave him the bad instruments to play. Truthfully though the ones I played weren't all that great or easy to play either!

I had some idea of what I wanted to play on these songs and I told my brother to play whatever he thought sounded good with what I was doing. I changed the tempo a few times on the first recording just to mix things up a bit. I'm not sure what the inspiration behind the first recording was, but the inspiration behind the second recording was "Papa Was A Rolling Stone" by The Temptations. When you hear the second recording (will be featured on my next blog post) surely you will not detect any trace of that classic song from 1972. But if you listen deep enough you'll see that my drum beat was similar to the single bass drum beat of Papa, and my 'bass' playing was also a repetitive 3-note line. And on this recording I also used something to ride like a hi-hat cymbal. So the beat was definitely lifted from that song. The bass line was different but similarly repetitive. And as far as what my brother played, well, he wasn't into the same kind of music I was so he just played whatever on the guitar and keyboard to fulfill his part of our deal.

So these were my very first recordings along with the one I did by myself from the previous post. Some time after this I would get my very own stereo system--nothing terribly expensive with a single cassette recorder and 2 microphone inputs. The 2 inputs allowed me to start recording in stereo which was in those days a dream come true for me. Not only that but I also started experimenting with using other devices instead of those voice-tuned microphones in order to get better recorded sounds, particularly in my attempt to get better bass sounds from my rubber bands!


Wednesday, October 9, 2019

From the Archives: My First Song (1989)



Well, here it is. My very first full-length song that I recorded on my own. I never gave this song a title for whatever reason. Maybe because at that point I wasn't frequently doing my own songs but rather doing 'covers' of songs that inspired me. That is, if you could call them covers. Regardless of the reason, this tune still remains untitled thirty years later.

First let me convey what was the inspiration behind this song. Around that time I used to listen to a lot of college radio--nothing's changed there--and some blues shows. I remember hearing a blues show that had a really cool beat and some Hammond organ. I was very interested in organs then and again nothing's changed. I used to tape a lot of songs from the radio and I'm pretty sure I recorded this one but I haven't been able to find it to this day. Another thing I did a lot back then was accidentally record over things and I suspect this is the fate this song experienced. Yet another issue during those days was tapes getting crunched and damaged in the cassette playing mechanism so this is a possibility as well. It's been thirty years and my memory has become less friendly over time.

So basically the beat in this song was inspired by the beat in that blues song. And while the song featured a full drum set, here I played a single empty candy can with one hand. It is the red one in the photo below:


I'm not sure but at the time I recorded this song the can may have been fully intact. Eventually I cut the bottom off and tried a variety of 'heads' that would give me a desire snare drum sound. Nothing every really worked of course. But it was better than nothing. It wasn't until a little later that I expanded the drums to the two coffee cans, two markers for drumsticks and that device on the left that held my 'cymbal' up. (That device was actually made from two reels from 8-track tape cartridges and a colored pencil).

Around this time my sister had purchased a dual-cassette boombox. This was something very new to me and I found it to be very cool. Not only that but it had a microphone jack. I started using this thing and it was through this that I discovered the magic of overdubbing. In case you don't know what that is, it is the ability to record something onto something that has already been recorded. That is, overlaying recordings. At first I began overlaying recordings of any kind of sound. This included voice, instrument sounds and whatever else until I finally realized I could make music with this.

This boombox was a Sanyo and its two most important features were the dual cassette capability which allowed you to make your own mix tapes, and the microphone jack. Mind you, without either one of these features I would have never stumbled upon what I actually did. I would not have the countless recordings that I made.

I ended up using this boombox more than even my sister did. I had great fun with it. The only thing I didn't like about it was that it only allowed mono microphone recordings. This was around the time that I started understanding what stereo was and began noticing the extreme differences on the left and right channels of many recordings from the 1960s. I was really interested in making stereo recordings but there was no way with this device and I wouldn't have the capability until sometime later. Thus, mono it was.

When I set out to record this song, I cannot confirm whether I did it all in one day or not. See, I've always been very shy about doing anything around anyone else so I always needed complete privacy when I recorded. That hasn't changed either. I still only record when absolutely no one else is around me. But I don't remember if I had the time I needed to do all four tracks which comprise this recording all in the same sitting. I'm leaning on the side that I did not and probably did only two or three tracks on the first day and the last one or two the next day or sometime soon after.

The first track I recorded was the drum track. Very unconventional for anyone and no less for me. Nowadays drums are usually the very last track I record. But for this recording 'drums' was the first. The second track was my 'bass'. This was another homemade instrument which unfortunately I don't have any photos of. After I moved into my current abode sixteen years ago I have not seen it. Fortunately it was nothing terribly complicated so I can still describe it in words and photos. One of my Christmas gifts as a child was a set of Chinese Checkers and traditional Checkers that came in a round tin that opened up and stored all the parts inside. Here are some pictures of the very same kind I had:




I used the traditional Checkers half for my bass instrument. (The other half would later be used with thinner rubber bands for guitar sounds). At that time we had some extra big & thick red rubber bands that one day I placed on this round pizza-pan-like tin and voila! I had a stringed instrument that if I put really close up to my ear sounded like the bass guitar sounds I had been hearing in a lot of my favorite songs. But there were at least two main problems with this instrument. First, as I already hinted, the volume was nearly inaudible. Second, how could I go about getting the exact notes I needed? Well, I came up with suitable-enough-for-me remedies that seemed to work but those were not to come till after my earliest recordings. For this song I had the rubber bands set to the notes I wanted, and in terms of volume I played the strings as close to the microphone as possible. (I should show some pics of the mics I used as well. They were nothing more than the generic mics that were used for voice recording onto cassettes).

The third track was a homemade guitar my dad had carved out of wood for me. This creation was probably never intended to be played or used as an instrument. But once fishing rod line and some small wood additions were added it became usable for a type of percussion sound if nothing else. I've posted photos of it before but here it is again:


So you can hear this guitar's sounds on the recording similar to how you might hear an acoustic guitar's strumming amidst a highly amplified soundscape. Or in the rhythmic way a mandolin player uses his instrument in a bluegrass band.

Finally, the fourth track is the Casio PT-1 keyboard that my brother bought for me as a gift once. After I started acquiring full-size keyboards over the years I ended up giving the Casio to my niece. Regrettably, she no longer has it nor remembers ever having it! This is what it looked like:


This was a tiny keyboard with a range of only four voices: piano, fantasy, violin, flute. The one used on this recording was flute. The part was completely improvised. Not being much of a musician at the time I didn't want to be very adventurous on the keys. But I was content with the end result.

Here's the thing about overdubbing with cheap tapes and microphones on analog equipment: each time you add another layer or overdub some of the quality of the earlier track(s) goes south. I have many of these recordings where I've seen the quality decrease substantially each time I added something new. And later when I started to do the stereo recordings the deterioration was even more noticeable due to the nature of my method.

That's the story behind this song. Certainly I wish it were of better sonic quality. But it was 1989 and I was a poor kid with no real gear for this sort of thing. Not to sound like an old person but today's kids have an immense amount of high quality gear at their disposal which are really just wasted in their hands. Such is life!

This has been the first of my many recordings. Plenty more to come!

Monday, September 16, 2019

Recordings From The Archive 1989-2019

We will soon be entering the final quarter of the year and once again the plan is to be as musically active as possible in order to prevent yet another rather inactive year. So to give you some very basic and generalized updates on my plans, I am planning to do a Halloween themed song and work on some Christmas music as well. Would still love to get a whole album of Christmas/holiday/seasonal music out there this year. I might have to be more reasonable and settle for a release that's a mix of original tunes and well-loved public domain ones. In fact, I am planning on recording a cover of that old standard, Jingle Bells.

Other than that I will create as the ideas and creative juices flow. On a more determined note, I have decided to start releasing the low-quality, analog recordings I made many, many years ago with my homemade instruments.

Why have I decided to do this now after all these years? Well, in case you don't know, Daniel Johnston died last week at the age of 58. Also in case you don't know, Johnston was considered an outsider musician who started recording his own original music on cassettes at home and distributing them to his co-workers and such. He started doing this around the age of 18 or 19 and eventually ended up with a recording contract, not so much due to his immense talent but more as a result of Kurt Cobain wearing a t-shirt that featured Johnston's album artwork. Cobain, Eddie Vedder and others have claimed to be influenced by Johnston's music.

The reason I will be releasing my old recordings is not because I think it will be a ticket to getting a recording contract with some label. Absolutely not. I don't want to oversimplify what Johnston did. It wasn't all just handing out cassettes, though he did that with anyone he met. But he also performed live, something I don't do and am not willing to do on a solo basis. He attracted attention with what he did. And there was no YouTube during his days of doing this. But all his recordings are out there now, as low-quality and bad as some of them may be. And that's what I want to do. Just get my recordings out there because otherwise they will live only in my experience and what is that point of that? Many of my recordings are just as low-quality and bad (if not worse) than his. I didn't start singing in my recordings till my late teens and even then they are scant and few. I never really wanted to be a singer at that time. At least not until I acquired a real guitar and started learning it.

The instrumental recordings aren't all that great either--off-tempo, off-key, noisy. But that's what you get when you're working with low-quality microphones, cassette tapes and homemade instruments. And it's not about the quality or the recordings. It's the history of my recording experience and the progression and growth I have made over the last 30 years.

Yes, my first recordings were made thirty years ago and I think this would be a great time to start releasing them. And the great thing is that I have digitized many of what I consider to be the more important recordings and have saved a good deal of the equipment I used to make them.

This is part of my history. I know many will not be interested in this. There has to be an intense curiosity in order to sit through the extremely low-fi sound and very limited musical ability on display. But for anyone who can appreciate someone discovering recording sounds in stereo vs. recording in mono and trying to make the most of what he has this may be a journey to explore.

I revisit these recordings from time to time. Very few others have heard any of them. For the most part and understandably so, no one was particularly impressed with anything they heard from my archives. I think it's the same thing that happens when I make a new recording nowadays. People are overlooking the fact that I did everything on my own and just expect to hear something that sounds radio-ready. They're only looking at the final product and not all the work that went into it. And it's even worse nowadays because people can produce music on computers without even knowing how to play a single musical instrument. And no, computers ARE NOT musical instruments. They're only tools. So these guys don't care if you don't recognize all the work that went into making a recording. All they want is you to appreciate the final product because they're not musicians.Yet I am both a musician and a producer.

I was a bit embarrassed by these recordings for a long, long time. They felt like the really bad pictures a kid draws with crayons when he's growing up. And you don't really want to show anyone those pictures if you even have them still. I kept my recordings and it's not necessarily for any other reason than that I tend to keep everything. Yes, I have hoarding tendencies. But I am glad I kept these.

Unfortunately, I have accidentally recorded over things in the past. The beauty of the cassette is that it has always been the most readily available media for recording something, anything. Its size, its price, its ubiquitousness were all pros when it came to the advocacy of this item. Yet the very fact that it could easily be rerecorded over and get erased were its downfall. And once those sounds were gone they were gone for good.

I'm glad I digitized many of these recordings when I did. Most of the original tapes I used were really cheap, low-quality ones. I didn't use the Sony, Maxell, Memorex or TDK brands. No. It was Certron for the most part and other forgettable names. And the sounds on most of them may be very shaky if not gone completely by now.

So I'll be uploading these recordings to YouTube on my Exit World channel. I considered Soundcloud but they give a fixed number of total minutes to upload your content. Once you reach that limit you have to pay in order to upload more. And I'm not about to pay for that service. So YouTube it is as there are no limits there. Once I upload there I will link to here as I write a post about each upload as long as my memory serves me well. This will definitely help me to become more active here as well.

I realize these uploads may not get any views. I'm prepared for that. It's not really about getting views. If I get them, great! If not, it was always about me putting them out there for me. Daniel Johnston didn't care about how good or bad he sounded. He didn't care about how lo-fi his recordings were. He wasn't worried about getting embarrassed. He just did what he was meant to do and didn't suppress it. And that's what I need to do. Hey, maybe if the people aren't listening to the good music I create perhaps they'll listen to the bad!

Monday, April 1, 2019

2019 Update

I didn't realize I haven't updated here since last summer! How time flies!!

Well, this is what's been going on since last June. I did not complete the Christmas song (Christmas in the City [reprise]) I was working on. I'd say I'm probably 75-80% done. I still need to finish some small synth parts, guitar parts and the drum track. But since I'm making this song a reprise I have to have the counterpart it's based on. I need a full song called "Christmas in the City." That I have not written yet. So if I plan to release at the very least a single for the holiday season, I feel I should have two songs to do so. It's not necessary, I know. Nowadays you only need to release a single track. But it may be strange to release a reprise song without having the original non-reprise song. Make sense?

The last several months I have been working on an instrumental version of "Stormy" by Dennis Yost & The Classics IV. It's a song I have always loved and I even did a guitar cover of it on YouTube some years ago. I came into a really cool Hammond organ late last year and it's a fabulous instrument. I started getting all these thoughts of doing some organ versions of my favorite songs. I started with "Stormy" and it's not quite done yet either. I really want to finish it before moving onto something else. Otherwise, I will end up with a bunch of unfinished projects. A few other covers I am excited at the thought of doing include "Gimme Some Lovin'" and "I'll Be Your Shelter". This organ is so cool that I have tons of songs I would like to do but I need to also stay focused on doing my own original material.

It is now April as I write this. What will I be able to get done this year? Will I get an original Christmas album ready? Or one of holiday covers? Or one of non-holiday music? Maybe an EP or a couple of singles. Perhaps a holiday single and a non-holiday single. That might be the most likely thing. Not ideal but that may be what I have to settle for. This is the era of the single. Oh, I should mention that I did officially release my song "If I Told You" late in 2018 through CD Baby, so it can be found there, on iTunes, Amazon, Spotify and other places. I did embellish the song a bit with a few extra things so it is not the same version that I uploaded to YouTube a while ago. This song has become one of my personal favorites.

What I really want to do is get back to my own music. As much as I may get excited about doing covers the truth is that most no one else would be interested and of course there can be no expectations of earning any money from it. It's almost like a TAXI type thing--you custom make music based on their listings and submit to them but they don't accept it. That's a lot of time and effort to spend that could otherwise be used towards making original music that you own the rights to. Problem is, I have not written much at all since the last post. A matter of distraction and discipline.

I am going to try to crank out something before it gets too hot in the studio. But even if it does get hot I will work through it. I remember the hot July recording sessions for "Tomorrow" that I toiled through. If necessary I'll do that again.

I have lots of ideas for things to record. Another consideration for this year is to release an album of instrumental recordings. I was entertaining the thought of calling it "The Soundtrack". There are some unreleased tracks would definitely fit in well on this. And I could easily make some more. Also there is still the possibility of recording a minimoog album. Had some ideas for some shoegazing or spaced out music that could make for something interesting. Or I may just merge this project with "the soundtrack" project if I start to lack in ideas or get pressed for time.